Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Unified Vietnam, Army 1983, Much 30th, 1983, Michel Nr. M40; A single stamp without a nominal value was issued in perforation 10.75. There are a number of perforation varieties on this issue, some of which are rather rudimentary, which suggests that some of the sheets were delivered imperforate to post offices and perforated there with whatever tools were on hand. Michel lists perforations from 9.5-12.

Here is the mint stamp (Perf. 10.75)

It appears that at least some imperforate stamps were sold over postal counters. Here is a mint vertical imperforate pair.

Some imperforate trial proofs have also come to market. Imperforate stamp with a weak printing run of the black color

Imperforate stamp with a passer-shift of the green color downwards

Imperforate stamp with a printing error on which the entire black printing run is missing.

The issue was also plagued with a host of production problems that led to numerous imperfections on the final print of the stamps. These are not particularly rare so do not warrant a significant surcharge over the price of the normal stamp.

Mint stamp in rough perforation 9.0 that shows a passer shift of the brown and green color downwards. 

Mint vertical pair (Perf. 10.75) that shows a partial failure of the brown printing run resulting in white streaks.

Detailed scan of the affected area

Mint stamp (Perf. 10.75) that shows a printing flaw of a large number of light dots embedded in the brown color that looks like “flares in the sky”. This was caused by improper adhesion of the brown color.

Mint block of four (Perf. 10.75) that shows some errant black and green color where they do not belong and a partial failure of the brown color resulting in white spots.

Detailed scans of the affected areas

Single franking of the stamp (Perf. 11.0) on a local letter from Phu Ton Province to HCM City in October of 1984.

Single franking of the stamp from Ferry of 1986 that documents the occupation of Cambodia. The letter was sent from the provincial capital Siem Riep, Cambodia to HCM City. All Cambodian occupation mail was centrally delivered to HCM post offices and processed there. The letter therefore carries a Ba Queo cancel which is a small post office outside of HCM City. Binh Thanh transit cancel on the reverse.

Single franking of the stamp (Perf. 10.75) on a local letter sent from Hanoi to HCN City in 1986.

Rare multiple franking of the stamp representing the second weight level on a local letter sent from Quan 5 to HCM City. The stamps show a perforation error. The stamps are imperforate in-between and on the right side. Error stamps on postally used cover are very rare.

Registration Nr. 103375

Comments are closed.