On May 10, 1940 Germany invaded France and with such military success that the French Government was forced to sign an armistice with Germany already on June 22nd, less than six weeks later.[1] The success of the Germans provided its Japanese ally with more leverage in the Asian theater of war and already on June 19th, 1940 Japan submitted to the Governor General of Indochina, Georges Catroux, with a demand to close all supply lines from Indochina to China.[2] An advantage that would logistically aid the Japanese fight against the Chinese.

While France was not keen to suffer infringements to its sovereignty, the semi-occupied country and a German aligned Vichy Government was in no position militarily or politically unwilling to defend the colony in Asia. The French therefore agreed to the demand a day later, resulting in the closure of the train line to Kunming by the end of June. This of course set in motion a rope-a-dope style action where the Japanese demanded more and more cooperation from the French in using Indochina as a war platform. These demands included naval basing rights, air bases, the right to transit troop movements, etc.[3]
Due to French recalcitrance, the Japanese Twenty Second Army finally crossed the Indochinese border to China on September 6th to provide gravity to the Japanese demands. This led to some skirmishes between the Japanese and French troops but also to protracted negotiations which ultimately led to an accord that met most of the Japanese objectives. This, set in motion a strange period in which one country (Japan) was essentially occupying Indochina while another country (France) was allowed to continue to administer it. This administration included the postal service.

Exhibit 1

The Japanese, focused on defeating the Chinese, were initially not interested, to saddle themselves with additional responsibilities consuming money and man power that a full occupation would have demanded. They instead showed a relatively light touch that also left the existing French postal system pretty much alone. Very few Japanese censor marks appear at the time and it was mostly official and company mail that was occasionally censored. Exhibit 1, which is ex Desrousseaux, shows a letter from a Japanese Fishing Company in Haiphong to the Director of Mining Services in Hanoi (a post occupied by J. Desrousseaux). The violet Japanese censor stamp along with the red seal of the censoring officer is prominently displayed on front. Japanese Military Mail was, of course, not transmitted using the French postal system but the Japanese Military Mail system. Exhibit 2 shows military air post card from Masaru Honjo of the Maruyasu Party, 38th Army, Shin 2949 Unit, Field Post Office 220 of the French Indochina Dispatch stationed in Hanoi to Kyoto City. Again, you can see the Japanese censor mark in front and an additional censor mark on the back. Among a general description of usual soldier’s sentiment, he writes:

I don’t need money but send me newspapers every week as we can only receive two air mails per week.”

The cut corner, by the way is no deficiency. It featured the imprinted postage stamp that was cut off as a sign that the card had been used. Exhibit 3 shows a similar card that is unused and hence shows the intact free frank imprint.

Exhibit 2 front
Exhibit 2 back
Exhibit 3

Poorly documented

Philatelically, the Japanese occupation of Indochina is poorly documented. In the SICP Journal Nr. 12 from June 1973 Desrousseaux, who having lived there at the time, was the ultimate expert on the subject, writes

Mail was very scarce during the Japanese period owing to the U.S. Bombing which destroyed all boats and railway bridges.”

He adds

We have never (seen) a single letter from or to foreign countries during this period even under Japanese occupation. Covers or cards of that period are very rare, especially with characteristics markings other than the date.

So, of course, with that kind of challenge the authors philatelic “hunting instincts” were on to systematically scan his collection and cover offerings just for such material. The result was a few covers that seemed to fit the bill of additional markings and foreign mail. Exhibit 4 shows a cover front featuring a pair of 40 cent blue-green Petain stamps from a registered letter mailed on February 19, 1943 from Saigon to Thailand. Please note the French censorship mark at the bottom left, that the Japanese continued to use. According to Desrousseaux the Japanese often unglued the envelopes by steam and so did not always use the old French banderoles.[4]

Exhibit 4

Exhibit 5 shows a cover sent on March 14, 1943 from Saigon to Cannes. Since that was situated in a part of France controlled by the German aligned Vichy Government the cover was not censored (Germany was a Japanese ally). Exhibit 6 shows a domestic cover sent from Hanoi to Saigon to, what I presume was Desrousseaux’s wife. The cancel is a bit smeared but the date looks like April 16, 1944. Again, the cover was censored by the Japanese using the old French military censor marks and in this case the banderole “Controle Postal Militaire”. Why this civilian cover was picked out to be censored is not known but it may have to do with the fact that J.Desrousseaux was employed as a high-level manager in the mining industry, and that the Japanese wanted to keep tabs on key industries and its personnel.

Exhibit 5
Exhibit 6

By September of 1944 the tide of war had changed and Germany was driven out of France by the Allied Forces. After the liberation of Paris, the Allies created a Provisional Government of the French Republic under de Gaulle which disbanded the traitorous Vichy Government in the South. [5]
The German retreat quickly put pressure on the Japanese. By March 1945 it was clear to most, that Germany would lose the war. This meant that European troops and resources could eventually be transferred to Asia to fight the Japanese. Being afraid of an Allied Invasion of Indochina, the Japanese therefore decided that leaving the French, who now were no longer beholden to Germany, in charge of administering the State would be a bad idea. So, on March 9th, 1945 the Japanese staged a coup and imprisoned most French troops and some high level French civilians in concentration camps taking over all Government functions, including the mail. Some French troops were able to flee across the border to China.[6]

Exhibit 7

Mail from this period which lasted less than six months, when the Japanese finally surrendered, is especially scarce. Exhibit 7 depicts a letter similar to the one featured by J. Desrousseaux in SICP Journal Nr. 13. Among various Japanese censor markings and a censor band that was fashioned out of a journal, it shows a stamp “Retour a L’Envoyeur” and a red manuscript “on request of Japanese authorities”. On this he writes

After March 10 Indochina Post Offices were only allowed to send and deliver a very small number of letters bearing a military marking or a manuscript warrant from Japanese authorities. The general mail was seized by the Japanese in the post offices and mail vans were usually destroyed. After censoring it they sent back to the addressor only the official mail. Some private letters sent before March 9th reached their adressees at the end of April.”

Exhibit 8 shows a registered commercial letter from Saigon to Hanoi mailed on May 15th, 1945. The letter carries a linear Japanese censor stamp on the registered label “Controle”, which originally came from the French telegraph control office.[7]

Exhibit 8 front
Exhibit 8 back

The Hanoi arrival stamp on the back is dated August 8th, 1945 indicating that it took almost 3 months for the letter to be delivered by foot messengers or low tech means of transportation such as pirogues or ox carts. Parallel to the Japanese take-over, Viet Minh groups were quickly set up in districts and provinces throughout Northern Vietnam and among the ethnic Viet in Laos to organize resistance movements against the Japanese. [8]

After the United States dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6th and 9th of 1945, Japan requested an armistice on August 15th. With all French troops being imprisoned or having fled a power vacuum was created that was immediately used by Vietnamese Nationalists and the Viet Minh to take charge by seizing control of the major cities and all key administration centers in the country.[9]

The Japanese, realizing that all was lost, offered no resistance and left the field pretty much to the Viet Minh and Nationalists to make it more difficult for the French to return to power. By August 19th, the Viet Minh had seized Hanoi and taken over the mail in all over the country. Very quickly, Nationalistic Vietnamese, French and Chinese slogans were now used to undermine the return of the French. Exhibit 9 shows a letter mailed on August 27th, 1945 (5 days before the formal surrender of the Japanese on September 2nd) from Hatien in the North to Long Nguyen north of Saigon. It carries a black two-line hand stamp in Chinese and French that states “Down with the oppressors”.

Exhibit 9

Of course, a liberated France was not about to give up on its former colony. Shortly after the Japanese coup de Gaulle took diplomatic action. He requested the assistance of the Allies to build up a French resistance movement in Indochina. [10]
The main objective being access to Allies shipping capacity that would enable troop and weapon movements. However, at that time the United States under Rooseveldt was non-comital. He felt that Indochina should be liberated from colonialism. Rooseveldt died on April 12th, 1945 but his influence on policy was still latently present when it was decided at the Potsdam Conference in July/August, 1945 that Indochina should not be liberated by the French but by British Forces south of the 16th parallel including Cambodia and the Chinese north thereof including most of Laos. In the last days of August, 1945 150,000 Chinese troops crossed the northern border and they entered Hanoi on September 9th to take charge and disarm the Japanese soldiers. The British (Nepalese Gurkhas and Muslims from the 20th Indian Division numbering less than 1,000) arrived a few days later, on September 12th and started doing the same in Saigon. However, it took until September 22nd before the imprisoned French troops were finally released, who, now re-armed, a day later, started an insurrection against the Vietnamese Nationalists.[11] Many historians consider September 23, 1945 as the start of the French-Indochinese War. By that time, the United States under its new president Truman had changed her mind. Worried that The French may politically move into the camp of Russia they decided it would be the lesser evil to allow the French to recolonize Indochina after all. The French battleship Richelieu and the light cruiser Triumphant arrived on October 3rd in Saigon and the 5th Colonial Regiment from Sri Lanka disembarked. The 2nd French Army Division arrived in late October. The 9th Colonial Division arrives shortly thereafter aboard eight American ships. By the end of the year, fanning out from Saigon, the French controlled most of Indochina south of the 16th parallel.[12]

Exhibit 10

Desrousseaux reports in SICP Journal 13 that the first French military post offices (BPM) were set up in October in Saigon and November in Hanoi. The troops used a “mute” Poste aux Armees” cancel with two six pointed stars (pictured in his article as Figure 138). Exhibit 10 shows this cancel but with a date that makes it unlikely to have been used in Indochina, as all French troops were still imprisoned at that time. Fellow member Ronald Bentley pointed out that these type of cancels were essentially “mobile cancels” that traveled with the respective troop unit. So, it is possible that the letter was sent as the soldier was in route to Indochina or from a French army unit not connected at all to Indochina but using the same “mute” canceler in the field. For that, the once secret field post address “S.P. 56.658” would have to be decoded and the author has been unable to do so. May be another member has some information regarding this or knows where the 1st D.C.E.O. Corps des Exidants” was operating in early September, 1945. The first French plane that left, after dropping off General Leclerc on the 5th, left on October 6th.[13]

Exhibit 11
Exhibit 12

So theoretically it may have carried back mail to France. However, the earliest civilian cover in the authors possession that documents the re-starting of civilian mail in Saigon is dated October 26th, 1945 (Exhibit 11). It has a civilian Saigon cancellation. For Phnom Penh (Cambodia), as identified by the senders address on the back, the earliest date is October 29th but here the military carried out the mail service as it is cancelled with the “mute” Postes aux Armees” canceller already described earlier (Exhibit 12).

The mobile cancel shown in Exhibit 10 and 12 must have been in operation only for a few weeks as Exhibition 13 shows. This letter, directed to Metz in France was mailed on December 25th, 1945 and it was cancelled with a Post aux Armes cancel that carried the addition “T.O.E.” at the bottom.

It would be interesting to see if other collectors have mail that documents earlier dates for South Vietnam and Cambodia or military mail that is clearly from Indochina and that documents the opening of the BPO’s in Saigon and Hanoi in October and November of 1945. Also, what is the earliest date in your collection that documents the opening of the postal route from Laos after the war? Please send any input to the editor.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_France

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_invasion_of_French_Indochina

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_invasion_of_French_Indochina

[4] J.Desrousseaux; SICP Journal Nr. 13, August 1973

[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vichy_France

[6] F.Logevall, Embers of War

[7] J.Desrousseaux; SICP Journal Nr. Nr. 12, June 1973

[8] S.Tonnesson, Vietnam 1946, How the war began

[9] S.Tonnesson, Vietnam 1946, How the war began

[10] S.Tonnesson, Vietnam 1946, How the war began

[11] S.Tonnesson, Vietnam 1946, How the war began

[12] F.Logevall, Embers of War

[13] J.Desrousseaux; SICP Journal Nr. 13, August 1973

Registration No. 090000

Comments are closed.

error: Content is protected !!